Skip to main content
Glama
blazickjp

ArXiv MCP Server

by blazickjp
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to ArXiv MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • arxiv-mcp

      Tejas242
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A streamlined MCP server that connects AI assistants to arXiv's vast collection of academic papers, enabling search, retrieval, and analysis of research papers.
      7
      1
      -

    • arxic-mcp

      Traves-Theberge
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI assistants with a seamless, programmatic interface to search and read academic papers from the open-access arXiv repository.
      2
      MIT

    • Deep Research MCP Server

      wlu03
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An advanced scholarly research MCP server that enables AI assistants to discover, fetch, process, and manage academic papers across multiple sources like arXiv, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar, with capabilities for summarization, citation analysis, and concept relationship extraction.
      2
      -

    • arxiv-agent-mcp

      tbaraniuk
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      This MCP server provides tools to search arXiv, score papers for relevance and citation impact, and find foundational references, enabling research assistants to compile reading lists.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are distinct (search vs. download vs. read), but several overlap: read_paper and read_paper_section both read content, and get_paper_latex vs. get_paper_latex_section have similar boundaries. Also, search_paper_text and semantic_search both find content in downloaded papers, though one is keyword and one is semantic.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Many tools follow verb_noun (search_papers, download_paper, list_papers, read_paper, get_abstract, watch_topic), but there is inconsistency: 'list_paper_latex_sections' vs 'get_paper_latex_section' mixes list/get, and 'reindex' is a vague verb. Also 'check_alerts' vs 'list_watches' uses different verb styles.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 19 tools, the server feels heavy for its core purpose of searching and reading individual papers. Several tools (latex variants, outline, section readers) add significant granularity that may not be necessary for most workflows, making the toolset feel bloated.

    Completeness2/5

    While core search/download/read is covered, there are gaps: no update/delete for downloaded papers, no tool to remove local papers, and no direct DOI export or reference manager integration beyond BibTeX. The watch_topic lifecycle is complete (create/check/list/delete), but local paper management is incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources