check_alerts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description explicitly states that the tool updates each watch's last_checked timestamp, which is a write operation. This directly contradicts the readOnlyHint: true annotation, causing confusion about the tool's side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three focused sentences covering purpose, usage, side effect, and return value. No redundancy, front-loaded with key action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, description adequately covers return format (summary with counts and metadata). Also mentions prerequisite and side effect. Covers essential context for a single-parameter tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds value beyond schema by specifying that the topic string must match exactly the one used in watch_topic, and that omitting it checks all watches. Schema already describes parameter, so baseline 3, but added nuance justifies 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool checks saved topic watches for new papers since last check, distinguishes from sibling watch_topic, and specifies behavior with and without the topic parameter.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context: prerequisite call to watch_topic, behavior with optional topic parameter, and that it updates timestamps. However, does not explicitly state when not to use or alternatives beyond watch_topic.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.