bos_smart_inventory_health

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility for disclosing behavior. It only lists categories and does not mention whether the tool is read-only, requires special permissions, or what the response format is. This is insufficient for safe and predictable use.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, but it is somewhat ambiguous: it lists categories but does not specify if the output is per product or aggregate. While concise, it sacrifices clarity and completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description should explain what the tool returns and its scope (e.g., per product or per store). It omits this information, leaving the agent uncertain about the response. Also lacks usage context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage for the single parameter store_id is 100%, and the description does not add additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides (store ID). Baseline of 3 is appropriate as the schema carries the load without extra help.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it classifies inventory health into four categories (out_of_stock, low, dead, healthy), using specific verb 'Phân loại' and resource 'tình trạng kho hàng'. It distinguishes from siblings like bos_inventory_low_stock which likely only lists low stock items, but the output structure is not explicitly stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool over siblings such as bos_inventory_check, bos_inventory_low_stock, or bos_store_inventory. The agent must infer context from the name and description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.