bos_customer_create
Create a new customer in the BOS ERP system by supplying name and phone, with optional email and address.
Instructions
Create a new customer
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| phone | Yes | ||
| No | |||
| address | No |
Create a new customer in the BOS ERP system by supplying name and phone, with optional email and address.
Create a new customer
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| phone | Yes | ||
| No | |||
| address | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It only states 'Create a new customer' but does not disclose side effects, idempotency, or required permissions. The behavioral context is lacking.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, no fluff, but it is too brief. It conveys minimal information without wasting words, earning a middle score.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 4 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is inadequate. It fails to provide essential behavioral or parameter context needed for correct tool invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to parameters (name, phone, email, address). It does not explain constraints or usage, leaving the agent to rely solely on parameter names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Create a new customer' clearly states the verb and resource. It differentiates from sibling tools like bos_customer_list and bos_customer_delete, but could add specific details to further disambiguate among many customer tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like bos_customer_update or bos_customer_search. The description does not mention prerequisites or context for creation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bizino/bos-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server