bos_customer_vouchers
Retrieve vouchers for the current customer, filtered by status: available, used, or expired.
Instructions
Get vouchers for current customer
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| status | No |
Retrieve vouchers for the current customer, filtered by status: available, used, or expired.
Get vouchers for current customer
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| status | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description lacks any behavioral details such as authentication needs, scoping of 'current customer', pagination, or response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words, but too brief to be helpful. Could expand without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite simplicity, description fails to mention the status filter or clarify 'current customer'. Incomplete for reliable use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has 1 parameter (status) with 0% description coverage. The description does not explain the parameter or its enum values, adding no meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description specifies verb 'Get', resource 'vouchers', and context 'for current customer'. It clearly distinguishes from similar tools like bos_cart_apply_voucher or bos_voucher_list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Does not mention the optional 'status' filter or any prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bizino/bos-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server