Get the admin action log

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so safety is already covered. The description adds meaningful behavioral context with 'Set fields in events to true to include those categories; leave empty to include everything,' clarifying default filter behavior. However, it doesn't disclose limit defaults or return ordering.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one sentence, front-loaded with the core purpose. It is concise without any filler, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters, a nested object, and no output schema, the description leaves significant gaps: it doesn't explain that `peer` is required, what 'recent' means, or the semantics of `limit` and `accountId`. Even with annotations providing safety context, the description is insufficient for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 20% (only 'query' has a description). The description compensates by explaining the `events` object semantics, but it leaves `peer`, `limit`, and `accountId` unexplained, relying on name inference. The `events` clarification is useful but the overall compensation is incomplete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Return recent admin events' with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from all sibling tools. No other tool in the list targets admin logs, making this highly unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving admin events but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or provide any exclusions. It offers clear context but no explicit 'when to use' guidance beyond the core purpose.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.