Delete a dialog folder
delete_folderRemove unwanted Telegram folders by ID to declutter chat list.
Instructions
Remove a folder by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| accountId | No |
delete_folderRemove unwanted Telegram folders by ID to declutter chat list.
Remove a folder by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| accountId | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The annotations already indicate destructiveHint: true, but the description adds no further behavioral context (e.g., permanence, effect on contained dialogs, or required permissions). It is consistent with annotations but does not enrich the operational understanding.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that directly states the action and object, with no redundant words. It is concise and front-loaded, earning its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple, but the description lacks details about side effects (e.g., what happens to dialogs in the folder) and does not mention the accountId parameter. It is minimally viable for a one-line delete operation but leaves gaps for edge cases.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description merely states 'by id' without elaborating on what the id refers to or explaining the optional accountId parameter. The description adds no meaning beyond the parameter names already present in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Remove') with a clear resource ('a folder') and identifier ('by id'), distinguishing it from sibling folder tools like create_folder, edit_folder, and reorder_folders. The title 'Delete a dialog folder' reinforces this.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor are any prerequisites or exclusions mentioned. The description only states the action, leaving the agent to infer usage from the function name and context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/beautyfree/mcp-telegram'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server