Create a dialog folder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With only openWorldHint=true in annotations, the description adds useful non-obvious behavior: 'id is auto-assigned to the next free slot 2..255.' This goes beyond the schema and annotations. It does not describe return values or failure modes, but the open-world mutation aspect is already hinted by the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two short sentences with no filler. It front-loads the primary purpose and adds a useful clarifying parenthetical, so every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given this tool has 12 parameters, no output schema, and only an openWorldHint annotation, the description is far too minimal. It provides no guidance on how filter parameters combine, defaults when omitted, title constraints, or the expected result, making it incomplete for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the 12 parameters. While names like excludeRead, includeBots, and pinnedPeers are somewhat self-explanatory, the semantics of peer arrays, interactions between include/exclude filters, and default values are left undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'dialog folder', with the parenthetical '(chat filter)' adding domain context. It is easily distinguished from sibling tools like edit_folder, delete_folder, and reorder_folders.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The use case is implied by 'Create a new dialog folder,' but there is no explicit guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any mention of prerequisites or conflicts with existing folders. The context is clear but lacks exclusions or alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.