Apply boost slots to a channel

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With only openWorldHint annotation, the description fails to disclose critical behavioral traits such as whether boosts are consumed permanently, whether the action is reversible, or any permission requirements. It simply restates the action without adding operational context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the verb and object. There is no filler or redundant information, making it maximally concise for the content it provides.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a mutating tool with no output schema and minimal annotations. The description leaves essential unknowns unresolved—such as the effect of applying boosts, reversibility, and how account selection works—making it inadequate for safe and correct use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the description does not explain the meaning of `peer`, how `slots` are identified, or the purpose of `accountId`. The only hint, 'one or more,' merely restates the schema's minItems constraint.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('apply') and clearly names the resource ('boost slots' to 'a channel'). It distinguishes the action from sibling tools like get_my_boosts, and adds 'one or more' to indicate quantity, avoiding a mere tautology.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no mention of prerequisites (e.g., owning boost slots or channel permissions), and no reference to sibling tools like get_my_boosts for checking available slots.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.