Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
@asyntai/mcp

@asyntai/mcp

Official
by asyntai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

List the embeds

list_embeds
Read-onlyIdempotent

List all embeds configured for a website. Provide a website ID to target a specific site, or leave it blank to use the account's primary website.

Instructions

List the third-party tools embedded in the chat, such as a booking calendar or a form. Embeds needs the Standard plan or higher.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_embeds"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
website_idNoNumeric id of the website, from list_websites. Omit to use the account's primary website.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.2

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already indicate readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive. The description adds the plan requirement but no further behavioral details, which is acceptable given the strong annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, direct, and free of fluff. It front-loads the core purpose and includes only essential additional context (plan requirement).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only list tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description covers the purpose, scope, examples, and a key prerequisite. No critical information is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is only one parameter (website_id) and its schema description fully explains its meaning and default behavior. The description adds no extra parameter context, but the schema already provides sufficient coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists third-party tools embedded in the chat, with concrete examples (booking calendar, form). This distinguishes it from other list tools like list_images or list_webhooks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides a clear prerequisite (Standard plan or higher) and references the website_id source from list_websites. However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternative list tools, though the name and scope make the intended use clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools