set_table_column_width

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description alone must disclose behavior. It does not mention what happens on invalid input (e.g., out-of-range column index), whether the operation is reversible, or if it triggers any side effects like table resizing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (one sentence) but lacks essential details, making it under-specified. While not verbose, it fails to earn its place by providing minimal value beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is completely inadequate. It does not explain parameter usage, return behavior, or error conditions, leaving an AI agent without sufficient context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning to any of the five parameters. For instance, 'width_type' defaults to 'points' but is not explained, and required parameters like 'doc_id', 'table_index', 'col_index', and 'width' lack any context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets a table column width. However, it does not distinguish from the sibling 'set_table_column_widths' (plural) which sets multiple widths, nor does it clarify the scope of this single-column operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over alternatives like 'set_table_column_widths', 'set_table_width', or 'auto_fit_table_columns'. No prerequisites or constraints are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.