get_all_notes
Extract all notes from a Word document. Returns a list of notes with their details for review or processing.
Instructions
Get a list of all document notes
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes |
Extract all notes from a Word document. Returns a list of notes with their details for review or processing.
Get a list of all document notes
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose return structure, ordering, or any side effects. Only states basic function without behavioral details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (one phrase), no wasted words, but could benefit from a brief sentence about parameter or return format without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Incomplete given one required parameter and no output schema; lacks information about what constitutes a 'note' and how the list is structured.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% for the single parameter 'doc_id'; description does not explain its purpose. Inferred but not clearly documented.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states verb and resource ('get a list of all document notes'), but does not clarify scope (e.g., per document or all documents) nor differentiate from sibling tools like get_all_comments.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternative note/comment retrieval tools. Lacks context about prerequisites or use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aspose-words/Aspose.Words-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server