insert_html_end
Append HTML content to the end of a Word document for automated document extension.
Instructions
Insert HTML at the end of the document
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes | ||
| html | Yes |
Append HTML content to the end of a Word document for automated document extension.
Insert HTML at the end of the document
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes | ||
| html | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, required permissions, or whether it modifies the document in place.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise at 6 words, with no fluff. However, it sacrifices necessary detail that could be added without much verbosity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description lacks context such as return values, whether the operation is applied immediately, or any prerequisites.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds no information about the parameters (doc_id, html). It does not explain what these parameters represent or any constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Insert HTML at the end of the document' clearly states the verb (insert), resource (HTML), and location (end of document). It differentiates from siblings like insert_html_start and insert_html_at_paragraph.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use vs alternatives. Does not mention when not to use or mention related tools like insert_html_start or insert_html_at_paragraph.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aspose-words/Aspose.Words-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server