insert_html_at_paragraph
Inserts HTML content into a Word document at a specific paragraph index.
Instructions
Insert HTML at the specified paragraph
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes | ||
| html | Yes | ||
| paragraph_index | Yes |
Inserts HTML content into a Word document at a specific paragraph index.
Insert HTML at the specified paragraph
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes | ||
| html | Yes | ||
| paragraph_index | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states the basic operation. It does not disclose behavior on invalid input, whether HTML is sanitized, or if existing content is replaced. Very limited transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence is concise and front-loaded, but the brevity sacrifices necessary detail. Every word is used, but the description is too short to be fully effective.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 3 required parameters, no output schema, no annotations, and many siblings, the description is completely inadequate. It omits critical context like what happens to existing content, HTML format requirements, or error handling.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and description adds no explanation for doc_id, html, or paragraph_index. The description only repeats parameter names implicitly. Fails to compensate for missing schema documentation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Insert HTML) and the target (at the specified paragraph), distinguishing it from siblings like insert_text_at_paragraph and insert_markdown_at_paragraph.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., insert_html_end, insert_markdown_at_paragraph). Missing prerequisites, limitations, or context for choosing this tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aspose-words/Aspose.Words-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server