Skip to main content
Glama
askads

Yandex Direct MCP

Уточнения

get_callouts
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieves callout extensions from the adextensions library for review or selection before attaching them to ads through the Ads service.

Instructions

Возвращает список уточнений из библиотеки adextensions. Привязать уточнение к объявлению можно через сервис Ads.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idsNoФильтр по id уточнений.
limitNoМаксимум объектов на страницу.
offsetNoСмещение постраничной выдачи.
client_loginNoЛогин клиента агентства или кабинета в управлении (из list_clients). Если не указан — YANDEX_DIRECT_LOGIN из конфигурации, а без него собственный аккаунт токена.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.6.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / client_login
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Логин клиента агентства или кабинета в управлении (из list_clients). Если не указан — YANDEX_DIRECT_LOGIN из конфигурации, а без него собственный аккаунт токена.",
      +  "pattern": "^[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9._@-]{0,99}$",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.5.1
    • changedInput schema / properties / ids / description
      Previous value: -"Filter by callout ids."New value: +"Фильтр по id уточнений."
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"Max objects per page."New value: +"Максимум объектов на страницу."
    • changedInput schema / properties / offset / description
      Previous value: -"Pagination offset."New value: +"Смещение постраничной выдачи."
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv0.1.1
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / maximum
      Previous value: -10000New value: +1000
  4. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the library-source scope and the cross-service linking note, but says nothing about pagination behavior, result size, or auth/account scoping.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no filler, and the core action is front-loaded before the cross-service note. Nothing redundant is included.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only paginated list tool with full schema coverage and rich annotations, the description covers the essentials. It is thin on what the returned callout objects contain and on pagination semantics, but no output schema exists to relieve that burden entirely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all four parameters (ids, limit, offset, client_login) are already documented in the schema, including the fallback behavior of client_login. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond that baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: returns a list of callouts from the adextensions library. The word 'список' plus the read framing distinguishes it from the sibling mutators add_callouts and delete_callouts, though those siblings are never named.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The second sentence clarifies scope by pointing out that linking a callout to an ad happens in the Ads service, which implicitly bounds what this tool does. However, there is no explicit 'use this when... instead of add_callouts/delete_callouts' guidance or prerequisite note.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.