qui_update_instance_order

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full responsibility for disclosing behavioral traits. It only says 'Call PUT endpoint' without describing effects, reversibility, permissions, or any side effects of reordering instances. This adds no behavioral transparency beyond the HTTP method.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, consisting of two sentences with no fluff. It front-loads the endpoint and provides structured argument guidance efficiently. Slightly more explanatory content would improve it without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is incomplete given the generic schema and lack of annotations. It does not explain what updating the instance order means, what the request body should contain, or what query parameters are accepted. The output schema exists but request semantics are missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only has a generic 'arguments' object with no parameter descriptions. The description adds structural information about how to pass path variables, query parameters, and body, which is helpful. However, it does not list the actual path, query, or body fields expected for this endpoint, so it only partially compensates for the 0% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the exact HTTP endpoint, but does not explicitly state what 'update_instance_order' does. The purpose is implied by the tool name and endpoint path, not clearly explained. It doesn't distinguish this tool from siblings beyond its name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool or how it differs from other instance-related tools like qui_update_instance or qui_list_instances. The only instructions are low-level argument passing details, not usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.