qui_edit_torrent_tracker

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description provides no behavioral context. It does not disclose side effects, required permissions, whether the operation replaces existing trackers, or what the response contains. The description merely repeats the endpoint path without any additional behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that directly states the calling convention. It is front-loaded and contains no unnecessary words, but it sacrifices semantic richness for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, an unhelpful schema, and no detailed output schema, the description leaves critical information missing. It provides no context on the purpose, required fields, or expected response, making it inadequate for an agent to use the tool correctly without external knowledge of the API.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema is an opaque free-form object, and description coverage is 0%. The description adds a generic structure (path variables, query in arguments.params, body in arguments.body) but does not enumerate or explain the specific path variables (instanceID, hash), query parameters, or required body fields. This is helpful but insufficient for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it calls a PUT endpoint for torrent trackers, which implies an edit operation, but it doesn't explicitly explain what 'edit' means (e.g., updating the tracker list or a specific tracker). The endpoint path is mentioned, distinguishing it from sibling get/add/remove tools, but the semantic purpose is vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like qui_add_torrent_trackers or qui_remove_torrent_trackers. The description only gives call syntax, with no use cases, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.