Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to qui-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing qBittorrent's WebUI API v2 as tools, enabling LLMs to manage torrents, categories, tags, RSS feeds, search plugins, and application settings.
      90
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing qbit_manage's Web API as tools, so an LLM can read and manage a qbit_manage instance: run maintenance commands on qBittorrent torrents, manage config files, scheduler, logs, security settings, and system state.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing Prowlarr's API v1 as tools for managing indexers, applications, download clients, and more, including cross-indexer searches and system commands.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for rTorrent BitTorrent automation, enabling torrent management (add/list/pause/delete), multi-source searching (Nyaa, Pirate Bay, etc.), and post-processing workflows via natural language.
      7
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP servers for VPN control (NordVPN) and torrent lifecycle management via Jackett search and qBittorrent operations, plus a unified CLI.
      5
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The 12 tools are organized around fairly distinct functional domains (torrents, RSS, torznab, backups, etc.), so misselection is rare. The main ambiguity is `qui_system`, which acts as a catch-all for auth, licenses, arr instances, notifications, and settings, and could be confused with `qui_instances` when an agent is looking for instance management.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent lowercase `qui_<domain>` pattern, and the underlying operations use a uniform CRUD-style naming convention such as `create_*`, `list_*`, `update_*`, and `delete_*`. There is no mixing of naming styles or unpredictable casing.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is within the ideal 3-15 range, and each tool maps to a meaningful resource area of the qui application. Even though several tools expose a large number of sub-operations, the tool count itself is well-scoped for the server's broad purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers CRUD and lifecycle operations across most major domains: instances, torrents, cross-seed, torznab, RSS, automations, backups, scanning, categories, and tags. A few direct actions like explicit torrent deletion are only available through generic bulk-action endpoints, but overall the coverage is strong with few dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues