qui_apply_cross_seed_season_pack

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description doesn't disclose side effects, required permissions, or whether the operation is destructive. It merely describes the HTTP call mechanism.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, clearly structured, no redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While output schema exists and reduces need to explain returns, the description lacks any context about the season pack apply process, prerequisites, or relationship to sibling tools. The generic schema and terse description leave significant gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides no property definitions (0% coverage), so the description's explanation that path variables go directly in arguments, query values in args.params, and body in args.body adds crucial structural meaning. However, it doesn't enumerate specific parameters expected by the endpoint.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly names the POST endpoint '/cross-seed/season-pack/apply' and uses the verb 'call', indicating the exact action. It differentiates from sibling tools like qui_check_cross_seed_season_pack by specifying the apply operation, though it doesn't elaborate on what applying entails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It only provides parameter-passing instructions, not usage context, preconditions, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.