pcb_export_pdf
Export the active PCB layout to PDF, returned as base64.
Instructions
Export the PCB layout to PDF (returned as base64). Requires a PCB document active.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| fileName | No |
Export the active PCB layout to PDF, returned as base64.
Export the PCB layout to PDF (returned as base64). Requires a PCB document active.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| fileName | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It mentions 'returned as base64', which adds context about output, but lacks details on side effects, permissions, or whether the operation is read-only.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, no wasted words. Front-loaded with verb and output format. Highly efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite simple tool (1 param, no output schema), description is too minimal: missing parameter details, behavioral context, and usage guidance beyond prerequisite.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has one parameter 'fileName' with 0% coverage (no description in schema). The description does not mention the parameter at all, providing no additional semantic meaning.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly specifies verb 'Export', resource 'PCB layout', format 'PDF', and return type 'base64'. Distinguishes from sibling export tools by format, but does not explicitly name alternatives.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Only states prerequisite 'Requires a PCB document active', but offers no guidance on when to use this tool vs other export tools like pcb_export_gerber or pcb_export_3d.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/anwarminarso/a2n-easyeda-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server