Skip to main content
Glama
anwarminarso

a2n-easyeda-mcp

by anwarminarso
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to a2n-easyeda-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • 果子狸MCP服务

      lyq11
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects Jia Li Chuang EDA / EasyEDA Pro schematics to MCP clients, enabling AI-driven schematic editing, reading, and analysis.
      19
      -

    • jlc-mcp

      InkRoad
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local Model Context Protocol server that exposes EasyEDA Pro design capabilities as MCP tools, enabling project inspection, schematic editing, PCB design, validation, and manufacturing exports through natural language.
      MIT

    • easyeda-mcp

      cheewee2000
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients like Claude Code to control a running EasyEDA Pro instance for PCB design automation, including DRC checks, project management, and script execution via a bridge server.
      7 npm
      MIT

    • jlceda-ai-agent

      jiangyiqi99
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate 嘉立创 EDA Professional through MCP, including schematic and PCB editing, component search and placement, net routing, DRC, and design capture.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 49 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Tools are clearly grouped by domain prefixes (eda, pcb, sch) and have distinct verb-noun patterns. Each tool targets a unique action and resource; no two tools appear to do the same thing, even for similar operations like reading circuit vs. validating netlist.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'domain_verb_noun' pattern in snake_case. Verbs like create, get, delete, export, save, run are used predictably across domains, making the set easy to navigate.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 49 tools, the count is high but somewhat justified by the broad scope covering schematic, PCB, and general operations. However, it exceeds the 25-tool threshold considered heavy, which may overwhelm agents.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers most core workflows for schematic and PCB design: CRUD, exports, DRC, netlist ops, and high-level assembly. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no separate delete for schematic wires, no sch_move_component) but can be worked around via low-level tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources