confluence_unwatch_page
Remove yourself as a watcher of a Confluence page to stop receiving notifications.
Instructions
Remove current user as a watcher of a page
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes | The page ID to unwatch |
Remove yourself as a watcher of a Confluence page to stop receiving notifications.
Remove current user as a watcher of a page
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pageId | Yes | The page ID to unwatch |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, description carries full burden. It discloses the mutation behavior and that it only affects the current user. Could mention if idempotent or if unwatching a non-watched page errors.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words, front-loaded with action and object.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description is complete. It explains the action and the input sufficiently.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (pageId described). Description does not add extra meaning beyond what schema already provides, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('remove') and resource ('current user as watcher of a page'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'confluence_watch_page'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The implication is it reverses 'watch_page', but no context on prerequisites or when unwatching is appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/anuragagrawal0430/atlassian-confluence-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server