confluence_get_personal_space_key
Retrieve the personal space key for the currently authenticated Confluence user.
Instructions
Get the personal space key for the current authenticated user
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve the personal space key for the currently authenticated Confluence user.
Get the personal space key for the current authenticated user
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, so the tool's behavior is safe. The description adds that it retrieves the key for the current user, which provides context beyond annotations. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence that conveys all necessary information without any extraneous words. Highly efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple nature (zero parameters, clear return value stated), the description is fully complete. Annotations cover safety, and the description explains what is returned, compensating for the lack of output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so schema covers all. The description does not need to add parameter details; a baseline of 4 is appropriate for no-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (get), the resource (personal space key), and the context (for the current authenticated user). It distinguishes from sibling tools like confluence_get_space_key which target different spaces.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as confluence_get_space_by_key or confluence_get_space. Usage is implied by the tool's name and description, but no direct comparisons or exclusions are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/anuragagrawal0430/atlassian-confluence-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server