confluence_get_comment_attachments
Retrieve all attachments linked to a specific Confluence comment by providing its comment ID.
Instructions
Get attachments on a comment
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| commentId | Yes | The comment ID |
Retrieve all attachments linked to a specific Confluence comment by providing its comment ID.
Get attachments on a comment
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| commentId | Yes | The comment ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint; description adds no behavioral context (e.g., return format, empty list handling, existence checks).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no filler. Could benefit from more detail but is appropriately concise for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Lacks output schema and description of return structure (e.g., list format, pagination). With only one param and no output schema, more context would help.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with commentId described. Description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get attachments on a comment' clearly states the verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools like get_page or get_page_labels.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings (e.g., get_page for page content). No when-not or alternative recommendations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/anuragagrawal0430/atlassian-confluence-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server