confluence_get_page_by_url

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false. The description does not add behavioral context beyond that (e.g., any rate limits, authorization needs). It is adequate but does not exceed what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with two examples. Every word serves a purpose; there is no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, read-only tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description fully explains the tool's purpose and input format. No missing information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema describes 'pageUrl' as 'The full Confluence page URL'. The description adds value by illustrating two example URL formats (display path and ?pageId=12345), which helps the agent understand acceptable inputs beyond the generic schema description. Schema coverage is 100%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Get) and resource (a page) with the method (by its Confluence URL), and provides concrete URL examples. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'confluence_get_page' (by ID) and 'confluence_get_page_by_title'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you have a Confluence URL, but it does not explicitly discuss when to prefer this over alternative tools (e.g., using page ID or title) or any prerequisites. The sibling list exists but is not referenced.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.