search_google
Open a browser tab with Google search results for your query. Enter a search term to find information quickly.
Instructions
Open a Google search for the query in the browser.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes |
Open a browser tab with Google search results for your query. Enter a search term to find information quickly.
Open a Google search for the query in the browser.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description discloses the browser-opening behavior, adding context beyond the readOnlyHint=false annotation. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys the core action without unnecessary details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple tool (1 param, no output schema), the description sufficiently explains the action, though it omits what happens after the browser opens.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema coverage, the description only states 'query' without detailing format, encoding, or constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb ('Open a Google search') and resource ('for the query in the browser'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like search_youtube.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., search_youtube, search_music_track) is provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/anmolol117/applescript-automation-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server