get_volume
Retrieve the current system audio output volume level, ranging from 0 to 100, enabling automation of volume-based workflows.
Instructions
Current system output volume (0-100).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve the current system audio output volume level, ranging from 0 to 100, enabling automation of volume-based workflows.
Current system output volume (0-100).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true. Description adds no new behavioral traits beyond the resource, but does not contradict annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words, immediately front-loads key information: resource and range.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a no-parameter getter with no output schema, the description fully conveys what the tool returns and its range, making it complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters; schema coverage 100% effectively. Description adds value by specifying the return value range (0-100), exceeding baseline 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'get' and resource 'system output volume' with range 0-100, distinguishing it from sibling tools like set_volume or mute.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when/not to use; purpose implicitly guides usage. No alternatives mentioned, but sufficient for a simple getter.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/anmolol117/applescript-automation-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server