list_shortcuts
Lists all Apple Shortcuts installed on your Mac, providing their names for easy reference.
Instructions
List the names of the user's installed Apple Shortcuts.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Lists all Apple Shortcuts installed on your Mac, providing their names for easy reference.
List the names of the user's installed Apple Shortcuts.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description adds that only names are listed (not full details), providing useful context beyond the annotation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that is front-loaded with the verb and resource, containing no extraneous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters, no output schema, and annotations present, the description is mostly complete. It could mention permission requirements or output structure, but for a simple read-only listing, it is adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so the description adds value by specifying that it lists only names, aligning with the baseline expectation for zero-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('List') and identifies the exact resource ('names of the user's installed Apple Shortcuts'), clearly stating what the tool does and distinguishing it from siblings like 'run_shortcut'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
While the purpose is clear for a simple listing tool, no explicit guidance is provided on when to use it versus alternatives. The context of listing vs. running shortcuts is implied but not stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/anmolol117/applescript-automation-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server