AppleScript Automation MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to AppleScript Automation MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local macOS MCP server for AI Agents that exposes safe endpoints for shell commands, files, processes, macOS automation, browser control, and more.60MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA minimal macOS GUI-automation MCP server providing tools to see app state, perform actions, manage apps, send notifications, and run AppleScripts with security boundaries.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that bridges AI agents and macOS, enabling automation of file navigation, application control, UI interaction, browser automation, and system operations.176MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for macOS Automator that enables AI to control Mac computers by executing AppleScript/JXA, running automation workflows, and performing system-level tasks like sending emails and organizing files.68 npm4MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI to fully control macOS — mouse, keyboard, terminal, screenshots, window management, UI element detection, and provides AI-optimized information reporting.3641 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceLocal macOS MCP servers for Mail, Calendar, Reminders, Notes, Contacts, Messages, Shortcuts, Files, Maps, and system tools. The unified Apple Tools server and individual app servers run over stdio with native macOS permissions; this is an MIT-licensed community project, unaffiliated with Apple.18412MIT
TDQS
Scored across 39 tools
Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose covering system info, app management, media, communication, and utilities. There is no overlap that would confuse an agent; even closely related tools like mute and is_muted or set_volume and get_volume are easily distinguishable by their action vs. query nature.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., close_app, get_volume, send_imessage). There are no mixed conventions or abbreviations, making the naming predictable and easy to understand.
With 39 tools, the server is extensive but still well-scoped for a general macOS automation tool. While slightly high, each tool addresses a distinct operation, and the count feels appropriate for the broad domain covered.
The tool set covers many common automation tasks (system info, apps, media, messaging, clipboard, reminders, shortcuts), but it lacks tools for file operations, calendar, browser control beyond opening URLs, and system preferences beyond volume/dark mode. These gaps limit its ability to handle some typical workflows.