user_get_card
Retrieve the business card details for a given user by providing their account ID.
Instructions
获取指定用户的名片信息。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account_id | Yes |
Retrieve the business card details for a given user by providing their account ID.
获取指定用户的名片信息。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only says 'get', implying a read operation. It does not disclose potential errors, authentication needs, or what happens if the user does not exist.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence. It could add a bit more detail without becoming verbose, but it is front-loaded and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description should explain return values and relationships to similar tools. It fails to do so, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The 'account_id' parameter has no description in the schema (0% coverage), and the tool description does not explain its meaning or format. The agent needs more context to provide a valid ID.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states the tool gets a user's business card info, which is clear. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling 'passport_get_user_card', which likely serves a similar purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'passport_get_user_card' or other user tools. The description only states what it does.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/andyleimc-source/mdymcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server