group_add_admin
Add an administrator to a group by specifying the group ID and account ID.
Instructions
添加群组管理员。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| group_id | Yes | ||
| account_id | Yes |
Add an administrator to a group by specifying the group ID and account ID.
添加群组管理员。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| group_id | Yes | ||
| account_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description indicates a mutation operation but provides no additional behavioral info beyond the basic function. No annotations to supplement. Lacks details on side effects, permissions, or reversibility.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff, directly to the point. Ideal conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Missing output schema, no annotations, and minimal description. For a tool with two required parameters and no return info, the description is incomplete for safe agent use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It does not explain what group_id and account_id represent, leaving the agent without meaningful parameter context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description '添加群组管理员' clearly states the action (add) and resource (group admin). It distinguishes from sibling tools like group_create or group_get_members by specifying the admin role.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like group_create or group_edit. No context on prerequisites or scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/andyleimc-source/mdymcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server