calendar_get_event_details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states 'get details' without mentioning read-only nature, authentication, rate limits, or what '详细信息' entails. Lacks transparency beyond the obvious.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence in Chinese with no redundancy. It is front-loaded and efficient, but could benefit from additional structured details without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so the description should clarify what '详细信息' includes (e.g., fields like time, attendees). It is vague for a detail-retrieval tool. Without annotations, the description is insufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not elaborate on the event_id parameter. While the parameter name is self-explanatory, the description adds no value beyond the schema. For a tool with 0% coverage, more explanation is expected.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '获取单个日程的详细信息' clearly states the action (get) and resource (single schedule details). It distinguishes from list operations like calendar_get_events by specifying '单个' (single). However, it closely mirrors the tool name, lacking additional context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings such as calendar_get_events (list) or calendar_get_unconfirmed_events. The description implies fetching details of a single event but does not explicitly state when it is appropriate or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.