post_get_user_posts
Retrieve posts from a specific user account. Provide the user ID to get their timeline.
Instructions
获取指定用户的动态。account_id 为目标用户ID。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_id | No | ||
| pagesize | No | ||
| account_id | Yes |
Retrieve posts from a specific user account. Provide the user ID to get their timeline.
获取指定用户的动态。account_id 为目标用户ID。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| max_id | No | ||
| pagesize | No | ||
| account_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states the action (get user posts) without mentioning idempotency, pagination behavior, rate limits, or authentication needs.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two brief sentences with no redundancy. However, the description sacrifices informativeness for brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a retrieval tool with three parameters and no output schema, the description lacks details on return format, pagination behavior, and required permissions, making it incomplete for optimal agent use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description only explains account_id (target user ID), but provides no meaning for max_id (pagination cursor) or pagesize (default 20). Given 0% schema description coverage, this is insufficient.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it retrieves posts for a specific user, with a brief note about the required account_id parameter. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like post_get_all_posts and post_get_group_posts by targeting a single user's posts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as post_get_all_posts or post_get_group_posts. The description omits any context about prerequisites, scenarios, or limitations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/andyleimc-source/mdymcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server