remove_domain_alias

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description carries the full burden. It only states that the tool removes an alias, giving no detail about irreversibility, permissions, effects on mail routing, or whether the alias must exist. The term 'remove' implies mutation, but no behavioral context is added beyond that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using one short sentence to state the action. It front-loads the core purpose with no filler words, but it may be too sparse for the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given three required parameters with zero documentation and no annotations, the description is incomplete. An agent cannot determine what zoid represents, how to format domain_name or domain_alias, or what the output schema contains. The existence of an output schema does not excuse the missing parameter and behavior context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the three parameters (zoid, domain_name, domain_alias). Parameter names are somewhat self-explanatory, but the description adds no meaning beyond the schema field titles, failing to compensate for the low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Remove') and a specific resource ('domain alias'), making the tool's function immediately clear. It is not a tautology and is distinguishable from siblings like add_domain_alias and delete_domain, though it does not explicitly contrast them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, when to use add_domain_alias instead, or conditions under which removal is appropriate. The instruction is purely declarative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.