get_domain_details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. The word 'Get' suggests a non-mutating read operation, but the description does not mention side effects, required permissions, rate limits, or any other behavioral traits beyond the action implied by the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words and is front-loaded. However, it is so terse that it sacrifices useful detail, making it minimally viable rather than genuinely well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return format is not the main gap. But for a tool with two unknown parameters and no usage guidance, the description is incomplete: an agent still does not know what values to pass for zoid or domain_name or when to choose this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain either parameter. 'zoid' and 'domain_name' are left entirely to the agent's inference, with no format, example, or semantics provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action ('Get') and a resource ('specific domain details'), which distinguishes it from batch operations like get_all_domains. However, it does not explicitly differentiate itself from other domain-related siblings such as verify_domain or set_primary_domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given for when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_all_domains or verify_domain. The description provides no context about prerequisites, when this is the right choice, or when another tool should be used.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.