get_specific_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral transparency. 'Get' implies a read-only operation, but the description does nothing to disclose response shape, required permissions, edge cases (e.g., not found), or any other behavior beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the key verb and resource, containing no filler. However, it is so terse that it sacrifices useful information about parameters and usage context, making it minimal rather than appropriately informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Even though an output schema exists, the description is incomplete because it does not clarify the role of the 'zgid' parameter or how this tool relates to the many task-related siblings. A user cannot confidently invoke it without guessing parameter semantics or consulting external knowledge.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning for the two required parameters. The parameter names 'zgid' and 'task_id' are not self-explanatory in this context; 'zgid' appears to be an internal identifier that is left completely unexplained. The description fails to compensate for the complete lack of schema-level parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb ('get') and resource ('specific task details'), making it obvious this retrieves a single task. It does not explicitly distinguish from get_all_tasks_in_group, but the word 'specific' implies one task versus multiple, so the core purpose is clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_all_tasks_in_group. It also does not mention the required context (e.g., that zgid likely refers to a group ID), so a user cannot determine when this is the right retrieval tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.