delete_bookmark

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Delete,' which implies a destructive mutation, but it does not state whether deletion is permanent, whether deleting a bookmark affects associated data, or whether special permissions are required.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no wasted words, which is concise. However, it is under-specified to the point of being almost purely a restatement of the tool name, so the brevity is not earned through informative density.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although the tool is simple and an output schema exists, the description is too thin for a destructive operation with two opaque parameters and no annotations. It does not explain the role of group_id in deletion, mention any side effects, or provide enough context for an agent to confidently invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning to the two required parameters, group_id and bookmark_id. The agent gets no explanation of what these identifiers represent or how they relate to the bookmark being deleted, so the description completely fails to compensate for the schema's silence.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Delete a bookmark.' It clearly communicates the action and differentiates from bookmark creation and retrieval siblings like create_bookmark and get_bookmark_details, though it largely repeats the tool name without adding extra scope or nuance.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor are prerequisites or exclusions mentioned. The description does not clarify which sibling tools should be preferred for checking bookmarks before deletion, such as get_all_bookmarks or get_bookmark_details.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.