supplier_invoice_show
Retrieve detailed information of a supplier invoice by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Show details of a specific supplier invoice
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Supplier invoice ID (UUID) |
Retrieve detailed information of a supplier invoice by providing its unique ID.
Show details of a specific supplier invoice
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Supplier invoice ID (UUID) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description only says 'Show details' without mentioning read-only nature, permissions, or what details are returned. With no output schema, more context is needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, concise but lacks essential details. It is not wasteful but could be more informative without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema and minimal description. The tool lacks information on return values, error handling, or idempotency, making it incomplete for a simple show operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (parameter 'id' has description). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Show details' and the resource 'supplier invoice', distinguishing it from siblings like 'supplier_invoice_bulk_create'. It is specific and not a tautology.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other show tools) or prerequisites. Usage is implied but not explicitly stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/alexey-pelykh/qontoctl'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server