Search Qmetry test cycles

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only says 'Search and list test cycles according to filters' without disclosing behavioral details like pagination (startAt, maxResults in schema), required filter fields, or whether it is read-only. The schema covers parameters but description adds no behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single clear sentence, efficient and front-loaded. It could include more value (like required fields) without losing conciseness, but it is not overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (nested filter object, many optional fields, no output schema), the description is too minimal. It does not explain pagination defaults, required projectId, or response structure. Incomplete for practical use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed descriptions for each parameter. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what's in the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as schema already defines semantics well.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Search and list test cycles according to filters'. It uses specific verb+resource (search/list test cycles) and distinguishes from siblings like get-qmetry-test-cycle (specific cycle retrieval) and other search tools for different entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context (search test cycles) but lacks explicit when-to-use guidance or contrast with alternatives. No mention of when not to use this tool or prerequisites like project ID requirement is only in schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.