Skip to main content
Glama
albertor03

Jira QMetry MCP Server

by albertor03

Get all Qmetry test case folders for a project

get-qmetry-test-case-folders

Retrieves all QMetry test case folders for a specified project, with optional sorting and count of associated test cases.

Instructions

Get all Qmetry test case folders for a given project key

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
shortNoPossible values - NAME,CREATED_ON,UPDATED_ON Pattern - sortField:sortOrder(asc/desc) For example if want to sorting on createOn in ascending order then need to pass CREATED_ON:asc
projectIdYesRefer id from the response of API "Get qmetry enabled projects".
withCountNoShow count of testCases associated with Folder
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description lacks behavioral details such as pagination, error handling, or authentication needs. Being a read operation, it is minimally transparent, but fails to add value beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no redundant information. Front-loads the purpose effectively.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and 3 parameters, the description is adequate but minimal. It does not describe the response structure or provide context on sorting behavior despite the 'short' parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning to the parameters beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'Qmetry test case folders' with the required input 'project key'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'search-qmetry-test-case-folders' by specifying 'all' folders.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'search-qmetry-test-case-folders'. The description does not specify limitations or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/albertor03/jira-qmetry-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server