Skip to main content
Glama
albertor03

Jira QMetry MCP Server

by albertor03

Clone Test Case

clone-qmetry-test-case

Clone a test case with optional configurations including summary, folder, version, comments, attachments, and requirement linking.

Instructions

Clone a test case with optional configurations

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesRefer id from the response of API "Search Test Case".
summaryYesSummary to set in cloned Test Case.
versionNoTest Case Version Number which want to clone. Pass "*" if want to clone all test case versions. Refer versionNo from the response of API "Get Test Case version details".
folderIdNoRefer id from the response of API "Get test case folders".
withCommentsNoIf true then all test case comments will get cloned.
withAttachmentsNoIf true then all attachments gets cloned.
withRequirementsNoIf true testcase will get cloned and the linkage with associated stories will preserve.
requirementToLinkNoJIRA Issue Id which want to link with cloned test case.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. Merely states 'Clone' but omits impacts, auth needs, or side effects. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words. However, it sacrifices informativeness for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 8 parameters and no output schema, description is too terse. Does not explain return values, behavior of optional configs, or parameter interactions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. Description adds no extra meaning beyond 'with optional configurations'. Baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb 'Clone' and resource 'test case' with 'optional configurations'. Distinguishes from siblings like 'copy-qmetry-test-case' but does not explicitly differentiate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'copy-qmetry-test-case' or 'add-test-case-version'. Lacks context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/albertor03/jira-qmetry-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server