Jira QMetry MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Jira QMetry MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes the QMetry Test Management for Jira Cloud REST API as tools for MCP-compatible clients. It enables users to manage test cases, test cycles, test executions, test plans, folders, and automation rules through natural language interactions.3032 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for QTM4J (QMetry Test Management for Jira) Open API, enabling test case and cycle management via natural language.2123 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for Zephyr Scale test management tool, enabling test case, test plan, test cycle, and test execution management.25 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Jira Cloud tailored for ALM projects with Zephyr Scale integration, enabling issue management, sprint tracking, and test step operations.408 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for Zephyr Scale test management supporting Jira Cloud and Data Center. It enables creating, reading, and managing test cases and test runs via the Atlassian REST API with official API-compliant schemas.16511 npm6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for self-hosted qTest Manager, enabling natural-language management of projects, modules, test cases, requirements, traceability, and test execution via the qTest REST API.31MIT
TDQS
Scored across 93 tools
Most tools target distinct resource-action pairs (e.g., test case vs test cycle). However, the high number of similar patterns (e.g., multiple 'get-custom-field' variants) may cause occasional confusion, though descriptions help.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create-qmetry-test-case, get-qmetry-test-cycle). Even abbreviations like 'tc' and 'tcy' are used consistently across similar operations.
93 tools is excessively high for a test management server. An agent would need to navigate an overwhelming list, making selection error-prone. A more focused set (20-40) would be appropriate.
The surface covers all major lifecycle operations for test cases, cycles, plans, folders, statuses, labels, steps, versions, linking, and custom fields. No obvious gaps are present.