wordpress_wp_theme_list_detailed

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It adds useful context about returned data (versions, status, active theme identification) but lacks safety disclosure (read-only implied but not stated), pagination behavior, or error handling details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Efficient single-sentence structure with information front-loaded. However, the '[UNIFIED]' prefix adds unexplained metadata that reduces clarity without adding value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Since no output schema exists, the description partially compensates by enumerating returned fields (versions, status, active theme). However, with zero schema coverage and no annotations, the omission of parameter documentation and safety properties leaves gaps for a complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% (the 'site' parameter is undocumented in schema) and the description fails to compensate by explaining the parameter format, expected values (URL vs ID), or semantics. Complete gap for the single required parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb 'List' with specific resource 'WordPress themes' and scope 'all'. Distinguishes from sibling 'wordpress_list_themes' by emphasizing 'detailed information' and specific fields (versions, status, active theme). Deducted 1 point for unexplained '[UNIFIED]' prefix.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this versus the sibling 'wordpress_list_themes' or prerequisites like authentication. The word 'detailed' implies usage but does not explicitly state selection criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.