openpanel_create_project

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full disclosure burden. Fails to mention what happens on duplicate names, required authentication scope, rate limits, or what the tool returns (project ID, full object, or boolean). Only the word 'Create' implies mutation behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is brief, but '[UNIFIED]' prefix wastes space without adding agent-relevant information. Content is under-specified rather than efficiently concise given the 4-parameter complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Inadequate for a creation tool with 4 parameters, 0% schema coverage, and no output schema. Description omits parameter meanings, return value structure, and error conditions—all critical gaps given the lack of structured metadata.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage. Description mentions none of the 4 parameters (site, name, domain, timezone) and provides no semantics for ambiguous fields like 'site' vs 'domain' or expected timezone format. Completely fails to compensate for undocumented schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States specific verb (Create) and resource (OpenPanel project). Differentiates from sibling tools like openpanel_create_client or openpanel_create_dashboard by specifying 'project' as the resource type, though '[UNIFIED]' prefix adds noise without value.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like openpanel_update_project or openpanel_list_projects. No prerequisites mentioned (e.g., checking for existing projects) and no workflow context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.