appwrite_get_bucket

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, yet description fails to disclose read-only nature, error handling behavior (e.g., what happens if bucket not found), rate limits, or required permissions beyond the implicit 'Get' verb.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is appropriately brief, but the '[UNIFIED]' prefix constitutes structural noise without explanation, reducing front-loading effectiveness and creating ambiguity about operational scope.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With zero schema coverage, no annotations, and no output schema, the description inadequately documents parameters and omits expected return value structure or content for the retrieved bucket, leaving the agent to guess what 'details' includes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% for both parameters. Description mentions 'by ID' hinting at bucket_id's purpose, but provides no explanation for 'site' parameter which is critical for multi-tenant Appwrite contexts where multiple instances/projects may exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States basic operation (Get bucket details) and scope (by ID), but contains unexplained '[UNIFIED]' metadata prefix and fails to distinguish from sibling tool 'appwrite_get_bucket_stats' which retrieves statistics rather than details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no guidance on when to use this versus list_buckets or get_bucket_stats, and no prerequisites for the required parameters (e.g., whether bucket_id must be from an existing bucket).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.