Delete iCloud File

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already signal destructiveness. The description adds the confirm parameter requirement, which is a behavioral safety guard. However, it omits details like permission needs, reversibility, or side effects on shared files.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one sentence, 10 words). While efficient, it sacrifices completeness. However, no padding exists. Front-loading is fine.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's destructive nature and 2 parameters, the description is too sparse. Missing details about return values (even though output schema exists), error handling, and the exact effect of confirm=true vs false.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It only mentions confirm=True, leaving path completely unexplained (e.g., format, valid values). This is insufficient for a 2-parameter tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action and resource ('Delete a file from iCloud Drive') and distinguishes it from sibling tools like icloud_list or icloud_read. It could be more specific (e.g., permanent deletion or move to trash) but is adequate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like icloud_move or manual file management. The only hint is the confirm requirement, but it lacks context about prerequisites or when deletion is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.