Remove Apple Alias

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description aligns with the annotation 'destructiveHint: true' by using 'remove', but it adds no further behavioral details (e.g., whether the action is reversible, permission requirements, or side effects). The annotation already covers the destructive nature, so the description meets a minimal threshold.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence) and contains no fluff, but it is under-specified. While concise, it sacrifices necessary detail, making it less effective for the agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's two required string parameters and the presence of an output schema, the description is insufficiently complete. It does not clarify what scope or alias represent, leaving gaps in understanding. The agent lacks context to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must explain the parameters but fails to do so. 'scope' and 'alias' are not elaborated, and 'scope target' in the description gives no parameter meaning. This leaves the agent without necessary guidance on how to populate the parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('remove') and the resource ('alias for a scope target'). It distinguishes from the sibling 'apple_preferences_add_alias', conveying a specific purpose. However, 'scope target' is somewhat vague, preventing a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'apple_preferences_add_alias' or other sibling tools. The context of usage (e.g., prerequisites, typical scenarios) is absent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.