kagconfig_summarize

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. The verb 'Summarize' implies a read-only operation, but the description does not explicitly state that the file is not modified, nor does it describe error behavior, path handling, or output format. The added detail about extracting title, resolution, and keys is helpful but not sufficient for a tool with no annotation safety hints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that states the action and the key extracted fields. There is no redundancy or unnecessary detail; every word contributes value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema, no annotations, and only a minimal parameter schema. The description does not describe the return value structure, error scenarios, or when to prefer this tool over siblings. While the tool is simple, the lack of output information and usage context leaves the description incomplete for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one required parameter 'path' with 0% description coverage. The description mentions the target file type (Config.tjs), which partially clarifies what the path should point to, but it does not explicitly describe the parameter's format, whether it is a file or directory, or any constraints. The tool name and context add some meaning, but the parameter remains under-specified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Summarize' with a clear resource 'KAG/Kirikiri Config.tjs' and lists the extracted fields (title, resolution, keys), distinguishing it from sibling tools like kagconfig_load and kagconfig_list_keys. This makes the tool's purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., kagconfig_load for full config access, kagconfig_list_keys for key enumeration). No exclusions, prerequisites, or recommended contexts are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.