kagconfig_load

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations available, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states that the tool loads a file into a map, but does not mention error handling, whether the file must exist, read-only nature, or side effects. The KAGConfigEX2 semantics are referenced but not explained.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence. The verb and resource are front-loaded, and every word provides necessary information without unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description gives the output type but not the exact return structure or path semantics. It also lacks usage context relative to sibling kagconfig tools, making it incomplete for an agent that needs to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description does not clarify the 'path' parameter at all. It is unclear whether path should point directly to Config.tjs or to a directory containing it. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema's bare type and name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool loads Config.tjs into a flat key→value map, using KAGConfigEX2 semantics. This is a specific verb+resource, and it distinguishes from siblings like kagconfig_summarize or kagconfig_set.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as kagconfig_list_keys or kagconfig_summarize. The description does not mention any exclusions or contextual use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.