list_webex_spaces

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It mentions the bot must be authenticated and lists parameters with defaults (max_results). However, it lacks details on pagination behavior, rate limits, or potential errors. The return type is vaguely described as 'Standardized response dictionary.'

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is succinct: one sentence introducing the tool, a note about the alias, a bullet-list style parameter description, and a return type statement. No unnecessary words, well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the tool's purpose, parameters, and return type adequately. Given the tool's simplicity (list with optional filters), it is mostly complete. However, it could mention if the list is paginated or any default ordering, but the max_results parameter implies pagination support.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description compensates by explaining each parameter: team_id (filter by team), space_type (with enum values 'direct' or 'group'), sort_by (with sort options), and max_results (default 100, max 1000). This adds significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List Webex spaces that the authenticated bot belongs to,' providing a specific verb and resource. The note about being an alias for list_webex_rooms differentiates it from similar tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly notes it's an alias for list_webex_rooms, helping the agent choose between synonyms. It also lists optional parameters for filtering, but does not provide explicit when-not-to-use scenarios or compare with other listing tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.